Sourcing
Medical and factual claims in our guides cite public authoritative sources. FDA, NIDDK, HHS, and peer institutions, linked at the end of each guide. Program facts (pricing, formats, policies) come from the program's own published materials and carry a review date; the program's site is always authoritative.
Claims policy
We never promise outcomes, never use enhancement or guarantee language, and attribute program performance claims (“the program reports…”) rather than adopting them. Compounded products are always identified as not FDA-approved. Onset and duration figures are presented as the program's claims with “individual results vary.”
Stories
Our experience pages are clearly labeled composite accounts, perspective, not testimonials, because real-patient testimonials in this category create privacy and compliance problems we choose not to have.
Ratings
Editorial ratings score published pricing and value, transparency, bundled services, policies, and compliance posture. They do not score clinical outcomes, which we cannot observe. Full criteria: how we match & rate.
The commission firewall
We may earn commissions on enrollments (disclosure). Payout levels never enter matching logic or ratings, and a program we can't stand behind editorially gets delisted regardless of economics.
Review cadence & corrections
Program pages and the comparison table are re-checked against published program materials on a recurring basis and after any known change. Every substantive page displays a last-reviewed date. Found an error? Contact us via the about page, corrections ship fast.